Commodities

Cases

Fighting individual and corporate efforts to corner and spoof commodity markets, illegally driving up the costs of investing in and acquiring commodity products.

Read More

Blog

Learn more from our expert commodities attorneys

Read More

News

Stay in the loop of Lowey’s updates, current events, and landmark victories.

Read More

Practice Overview

Lowey Dannenberg:
Fighting commodities manipulation and defending market competition

Lowey Dannenberg represents investors, consumers, and market participants in high-stakes commodity and derivatives litigation arising from market manipulation, benchmark-rate rigging, collusive trading practices, and other violations of the Commodity Exchange Act and related laws.
The firm's commodities team has been at the forefront of some of the most significant commodity and financial benchmark cases in the United States, pursuing claims against major global banks, trading firms, and financial institutions for conduct that distorted commodity and derivatives markets.
Lowey Dannenberg has played leadership roles in numerous landmark cases involving allegations that financial institutions coordinated trading activity or manipulated benchmark rates to benefit their trading positions at the expense of investors.

Led by

Seasoned attorneys who have built their careers around prosecuting market manipulation and unfair practices

Vincent Briganti

Commodities

Vincent Briganti is Chairman of Lowey Dannenberg, P.C. He is the head of the Firm’s Antitrust and Commodities and Derivatives Practice Groups.

Read More

Geoffrey Horn

Commodities

Geoffrey Horn heads the firm’s commodity litigation practice group, one of the premier commodity litigation practice groups in the country. 

Read More

Cases

London Silver

Lowey Dannenberg was appointed co-lead counsel in a class action, alleging that a group of 8 major financial institutions colluded to fix the outcome of the London Silver Fix, a global benchmark that impacts the value of more than $30 billion in silver and silver financial instruments.

Read More

Swiss Franc LIBOR

In February 2015, Lowey Dannenberg filed a proposed class action against global financial institutions responsible for setting the London Interbank Offered Rate for the Swiss Franc (Swiss Franc LIBOR).

Read More

SIBOR/SOR

Lowey Dannenberg filed a proposed class action in July 2015 alleging that the 20 global financial institutions responsible for setting the Singapore Interbank Offered Rate (“SIBOR”) and the Singapore Swap Offer Rate (“SOR”) manipulated these benchmark rates to benefit their own derivatives positions at the expense of U.S. investors.

Read More

Sterling LIBOR

Lowey Dannenberg filed a proposed class action in May 2015 against global financial institutions responsible for setting the Sterling London Interbank Offered Rate (Sterling LIBOR) for allegedly colluding to manipulate Sterling LIBOR to increase their profits at the expense of investors.

Read More

Australian Bank Bill Swap Reference Rate

Lowey Dannenberg filed a proposed class action in August 2016 alleging that global financial institutions responsible for setting the Bank Bill Swap Reference Rate (“BBSW”), the primary interest rate benchmark used to price and settle Australian dollar-denominated derivatives, colluded to manipulate the benchmark rate to profit in their related derivatives positions at the expense of investors.

Read More

Euribor

In February 2013, Lowey Dannenberg filed a proposed class action against global financial institutions responsible for setting the Euro Interbank Offered Rate (Euribor), a global reference rate used to benchmark and price settle more than $200 trillion of financial products, including Euribor futures contracts traded on the NYSE LIFFE exchange.

Read More

Sugar

In Sugar, plaintiffs allege a price fixing and information exchange conspiracy against the largest Sugar producers in the United States. The Court held that our pleadings survived Twombly on both our per se price fixing claims and our rule of reason information exchange claims.

On October 15th, 2025, Judge Blackwell denied the motion to dismiss as against the two largest sugar producers in the country, Domino Sugar and United Sugar, on nearly 100 state antitrust, consumer protection, and equitable claims.

Read More

In Re: Shell Eggs Antitrust Litigation

On June 8, Lowey Dannenberg Chairman Vincent Briganti was appointed as Co-Lead Counsel for the Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs in In Re: Shell Eggs Antitrust Litigation, No. 3:26-md-03175-JDP (W.D. Wisc.)

Plaintiffs in this case allege that the dominant producers of eggs in the United States have fixed and raised prices to artificially high levels since at least January 1, 2022.

Read More

Real Results

Uncovering market manipulation in commodity and derivative markets.

See Cases

California Scheming: Gas Price Manipulation Hits the West Coast

by | May 18, 2020 | Antitrust, Blog, Commodities | 0 Comments

The gas market, with its pricing benchmarks based on self-reported transactions, has long been a fertile field for price manipulation. For example, in In re Natural Gas Commodity Litigation, No. 03 CV 6186 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 14, 2004), plaintiffs alleged that energy...

Read More
{

“Thank you all very much, and congratulations on achieving what appears to be a very fine settlement. I know counsel worked very hard on this, and I appreciate the efforts of all involved in the case.”

~ Hon. P. Kevin Castel, United States District Judge

Landmark Outcomes

In a class action alleging that global financial institutions manipulated the Euro Interbank Offered Rate (Euribor), Lowey Dannenberg secured $309 million settlements from Defendants Barclays, Deutsche Bank, and HSBC, which the Hon. P. Kevin Castel preliminary approved and praised.

Additional Notable Achievements

Our practice has a history of successful prosecutions for commodity price manipulation across precious metals, agriculture, energy, and foreign exchange markets. 

Amaranth

Lowey Dannenberg served as co-lead counsel in a certified class action representing investors harmed when Amaranth Advisors LLC, one of the largest natural gas hedge funds prior to its collapse in September 2006, allegedly used its market power to manipulate NYMEX natural gas futures and options contract prices. In April 2012, a District Court Judge for the Southern District of New York approved a $77.1 million settlement.

The amount overshadowed the $7.5 million joint settlement negotiated by government regulators and represented the then fourth largest class action recovery in the history of the CEA.

In re: Amaranth Natural Gas Commodity Litigation, Case No. 07 Civ. 6377 (SAS) (S.D.N.Y.)

Natural Gas

Lowey Dannenberg served as co-lead counsel to represent New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) natural gas futures traders against the nation’s largest natural gas marketing companies. More than 20 of the largest energy companies allegedly manipulated the price of natural gas futures contracts traded on the NYMEX by falsely reporting transaction data to publications that compile and publish the price benchmarks used to settle and price global trade. The alleged manipulation undermined the entire pricing structure in the U.S. natural gas market, including the price of NYMEX natural gas futures contracts.

Lowey achieved nearly $101 million in settlement, the then third largest recovery in the history of the CEA.

In re: Natural Gas Commodity Litigation, Case No. 03 Civ. 6186 (S.D.N.Y.)

PIMCO

Lowey Dannenberg represented lead class representative Richard Hershey in a certified class action against Pacific Investment Management Corp. (“PIMCO”) for manipulating the multi-billion-dollar market of U.S. 10-Year Treasury Note futures contracts.

The case settled in 2011 for $118.75 million, the then second largest recovery in the CEA’s history.

Hershey v. Pacific Investment Management Corp., Case No. 05 Civ. 4681 (RAG) (N.D.Ill.)

Optiver Crude Oil, Gasoline and Heating Oil Manipulation

Lowey Dannenberg served as co-lead counsel in a proposed class action involving the alleged manipulation of NYMEX light sweet crude oil, heating oil and gasoline futures contracts prices by Optiver US, LLC and other Optiver defendants.

In June 2015, the Court granted final approval to a $16.75 million settlement with defendants.

In re: Optiver Commodities Litigation, Case No. 08-cv-6842 (S.D.N.Y.)

Have a Case You Think We Can Help With?

Get Our Newsletter