Decades of Experience
Fighting for Privacy Concerns.

Privacy Litigation Lawyers.
More than 50 years of landmark results.

Free Case Evaluation

On the Cutting Edge of Privacy Litigation

Lowey Dannenberg represents clients whose privacy rights have been violated, bringing with them extensive experience litigating class actions against some of the largest technology and fintech companies in the nation,

Our attorneys help individuals address privacy concerns regarding the improper collection, disclosure and use of their personal information, whether it occurred through the use of complex technologies such as tracking pixels, cookies, or integrated SDKS embedded in mobile applications, or as a result of negligent data handling practices, like a data breach.

Shaping the Landscape of Privacy Law

Lowey Dannenberg is at the forefront of data privacy law, litigating novel data privacy cases throughout the nation. Courts routinely recognize attorneys at Lowey Dannenberg for demonstrating leadership, legal acumen, creative thinking, and excellent lawyering resulting in groundbreaking decisions in privacy litigation. Our attorneys have achieved landmark victories that have ultimately helped shape the privacy landscape in favor of consumers.

On the Cutting Edge of Privacy Litigation

Lowey Dannenberg represents clients whose privacy rights have been infringed, bringing with them extensive experience litigating class actions against some of the largest technology and fintech companies in the nation, including Google LLC, Meta Platforms, Inc. (formerly Facebook, Inc.), TikTok, Inc., and Yodlee, Inc. Our attorneys help address individuals’ privacy concerns regarding the improper collection, disclosure and use of their personal information, whether it occurred through the use of complex technologies such as tracking pixels, cookies, or integrated SDKS and APIs, or as a result of negligent data handling practices.

Shaping the Landscape of Privacy Law

Lowey Dannenberg is at the forefront of litigating novel data privacy cases throughout the nation. Courts routinely recognize attorneys at Lowey Dannenberg for demonstrating leadership, legal acumen, creative thinking, and excellent lawyering resulting in groundbreaking decisions in privacy litigation. Our attorneys have achieved ground-breaking, landmark victories that have ultimately helped shape the privacy landscape in favor of consumers.


Types of Cases

• Federal Wiretap Act

• Stored Communications Act

• Biometric Information Privacy Act

• California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act

• California Invasion of Privacy Act

• New York General Business Law

• Drivers Privacy Protection Act

• Video Privacy Protection Act

• Intrusion Upon Seclusion

• Negligence


Types of Technology

• Tracking Pixels

• Cookies

• Software Development Kits (SDKs)

• Application Programming Interface (APIs)

• Session Replay Software

• Auto-Populate Feature


• Biometric (e.g face scan, hand/finger print, voice

recognition)


Types of Technology

• Tracking Pixels

• Cookies

• Software Development Kits (SDKs)

• Application Programming Interface (APIs)

• Session Replay Software

• Auto-Populate Feature


Types of Cases

• Federal Wiretap Act

• Stored Communications Act

• Biometric Information Privacy Act

• California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act

• California Invasion of Privacy Act

• New York General Business Law

• Drivers Privacy Protection Act

• Video Privacy Protection Act

• Intrusion Upon Seclusion

• Negligence

Ground-Breaking Decisions

Facebook Twitter Google-plus

Frasco v. Flo Health, Inc

In Frasco v. Flo Health, Inc. out in the Northern District of California, Lowey Dannenberg sustained defeated motions to dismiss a first-of-its-kind aiding and abetting violations of the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act against Google LLC, Meta Platforms, Inc., and Flurry, Inc. Plaintiffs alleged Flo Health, Inc., the creator of the popular women’s health app Flo, incorporated these companies SDKs into its app, which caused the disclosure of their private medical data, including fertility and menstruation information.

Also in California, Plaintiffs recently certified a class of consumers who allegedly were harmed by Google, LLC’s unlawful collection of their voice recordings through Google Assistant-enabled devices in In re Google Assistant Privacy Litigation. Another first-of-its-kind case.

In In re USAA Data Security Litigation up in New York, Lowey Dannenberg was one of the first firms in the country to defeat a motion to dismiss Drivers Privacy Protection Act claims arising out of an insurance company’s auto-populate feature that disclosed consumers’ private motor vehicle records to hackers and other unwanted third parties.

And in Pennsylvania, Lowey Dannenberg’s successful lawyering led to the first Pennsylvania federal court decision (In re Rutter’s Inc. Data Security Breach Litigation, Case No. 20-cv-00382 (M.D. Pa.) to recognize a company’s independent duty to safeguard credit and debit card information in its possession.

Ground-Breaking Decisions

In Frasco v. Flo Health, Inc. out in the Northern District of California, Lowey Dannenberg sustained first-of-its-kind aiding and abetting violations of the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act against Google LLC, Meta Platforms, Inc., and Flurry, Inc. Plaintiffs alleged Flo Health, Inc., the creator of the popular women’s health app Flo, incorporated these companies SDKs into its app, which caused the disclosure of their private medical data, including fertility and menstruation information.

Also in California, Plaintiffs recently certified a class of consumers who were harmed by Google, LLC’s unlawful collection of their voice recordings through Google Assistant-enabled devices in In re Google Assistant Privacy Litigation. Another first-of-its-kind case.

In In re USAA Data Security Litigation up in Massachusetts, Lowey Dannenberg was one of the first firms in the country to defeat a motion to dismiss Drivers Privacy Protection Act claims arising out of an insurance company’s auto-populate feature that disclosed consumers’ private motor vehicle records to hackers and other unwanted third parties.

And in Pennsylvania, Lowey Dannenberg’s successful lawyering led to the first Pennsylvania federal court decision (In re Rutter’s Inc. Data Security Breach Litigation, Case No. 20-cv-00382 (M.D. Pa.) to recognize a company’s duty to safeguard credit and debit card information in its possession.

Other Representative Cases

Lowey Dannenberg is co-lead counsel in this case against Yodlee, Inc., one of the largest data and analytics companies in the world. Lowey Dannenberg represents a class of consumers who allege their financial data Yodlee, Inc. was secretly collected and sold without consent through software incorporated in third party applications. Lowey Dannenberg has successfully defeated two rounds of motion to dismiss briefing, and a motion for summary judgment, leaving intact claims for invasion of privacy, fraud, and violation of California’s Anti-Phishing Act.
Wesch v. Yodlee, 20-cv-05991 (N.D. Cal.).
Lowey Dannenberg serves as co-lead class counsel in one of the largest privacy cases in the country, representing a class of consumers against tech giant Google. Plaintiffs’ claims arise out of Google’s unlawful and intentional recording of Plaintiffs’ and class members’ confidential communications without their consent through Google phones and Google/Nest Home devices using its Google Assistant software. Lowey Dannenberg has successfully defeated several rounds of motion to dismiss briefing over two years of litigation, and certified a class consisting of individuals who purchased Google devices that use the assistant.
In re Google Assistant Privacy Litigation, No. 19-cv-04286 (N.D. Cal.).
Lowey Dannenberg serves as co-lead class counsel in one of the largest privacy cases in the country, representing a class of consumers against tech giant Google. Plaintiffs’ claims arise out of Google’s unlawful and intentional recording of Plaintiffs’ and class members’ confidential communications without their consent through its Google Assistant software. Lowey Dannenberg has successfully defeated several rounds of motion to dismiss briefing over two years of litigation, and recently certified a class.
In re Google Assistant Privacy Litigation, No. 19-cv-04286 (N.D. Cal.).
Lowey Dannenberg serves as court appointed co-lead counsel in a class action against Flo Health, Inc. (“Flo”), Google, LLC, Facebook, Inc., and Flurry, Inc. Plaintiffs represent a class of consumers alleging that Flo collected and disclosed their intimate health data to some of the largest data analytics and advertising companies in the world. Plaintiffs allege claims for invasion of privacy, breach of contract, and violation of the Federal Wiretap Act, among others. Lowey successfully defeated two separate motions to dismiss, including sustaining first-of-its-kind aiding and abetting violations of the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act claims against Google, LLC, Facebook, Inc., and Flurry, Inc.
Frasco v. Flo Health, Inc., N o. 21-cv-00757 (N.D. Cal.).
Briccetti appointed Lowey Dannenberg as co-lead counsel representing a proposed class of consumer plaintiffs. The case alleges that United Services Automobile Association (“USAA”) allowed unauthorized third parties to intentionally target and improperly obtain Plaintiffs’ and class members’ personally identifiable information, including Driver’s License numbers, through the use of USAA’s online insurance quote and/or policy process. Plaintiffs defeated Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, including sustaining claims pursuant to the Drivers Privacy Protection Act
In re USAA Data Security Litigation, No. 21-cv-05813 (S.D.N.Y.).
Lowey Dannenberg represents a class of Favor (formerly Pill Club) website and app users alleging their personal data, including prescription information relating to birth control and Plan B, were unlawfully disclosed to and intercepted by Meta Platforms, Inc., TikTok, Inc., and FullStory Inc. using sophisticated tracking technology and Session Replay Software.
Doe v. Favor, Inc., 3:23-00059 (N.D. Cal.).
Lowey Dannenberg served as court-appointed class counsel on behalf of millions of consumers alleging their data was mishandled by one of the largest alcohol delivery companies, Drizly LLC (“Drizly”). On March 30, 2021, U.S. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin granted preliminary approval of a settlement worth a total of [$$$]. On November 22, 2021, the Court granted final approval of the settlement. As a result of Lowey Dannenberg’s robust notice program, Drizly paid the maximum amount under the terms of the settlement.
Barr v. Drizly, LLC, Case No. 20-CV-11492 (D. Mass.).
Previous
Next

Our Experts: Ready To Help

Christian Levis

Partner

Christian Levis heads Lowey Dannenberg’s privacy practice group and has served as co-lead counsel in several prominent actions resulting in hundreds of millions of dollars recovered on behalf of individuals. An avid computer programmer with experience developing both iOS and Android apps, Mr. Levis has extensive experience litigating privacy class actions against some of the largest technology companies in the world.

Mr. Levis currently leads the prosecution in In re Google Assistant Priv. Litig., No. 5:19-cv-04286 (N.D. Cal.), a class action on behalf of Google Assistant Enabled Device users whose conversations were obtained by Google, LLC and shared with third parties without users’ consent, and Wesch v. Yodlee, No. 3:20-cv-05991 (N.D. Cal), another data privacy action alleging defendant collected and disclosed the sensitive financial information of tens of millions of individuals without their consent. Mr. Levis also serves as court appointed co-lead counsel in Frasco v. Flo Health, Inc., No. 3:21-cv-00757-JD (N.D. Cal.), alleging that Meta Platforms, Inc., Google LLC, Flurry, Inc., and Flo Health, Inc. intruded on the privacy rights of women by collecting app users’ medical information (including menstrual and fertility data) without consent. Other prominent actions include USAA Data Security Litigation, No. 21-cv-05813 (S.D.N.Y.) and Barr v. Drizly, LLC, Case No. 20-CV-11492 (D. Mass.).

Mr. Levis is a member of the New York State Bar Association’s Committee on Technology and the Legal Profession and is an expert in the use of analytics and technology-assisted document review in large class actions. Mr. Levis was selected as a Rising Star in the 2021 and 2022 editions of Super Lawyers.

Facebook Twitter Dribbble Behance

Amanda Fiorilla

Associate

Amanda Fiorilla is one of the founding members of the firm’s privacy and data breach practices and is well-versed in the unique issues arising in these types of cases. Ms. Fiorilla plays an integral role in several privacy class actions litigating against many large technology companies, including in Frasco v. Flo Health, Inc., No. 3:21-cv-00757-JD (N.D. Cal.) and Wesch v. Yodlee, No. 3:20-cv-05991 (N.D. Cal).

She, along with other members of the firm’s privacy group, serve as co-lead counsel in In re USAA Data Security Litigation, No. 21-cv-05813 (S.D.N.Y.). Their efforts resulted in one of the first decisions of its kind to sustain Drivers Privacy Protection Act claims arising out of an insurance company’s auto-populate feature that disclosed consumers’ private motor vehicle records to hackers and other unwanted third parties. Ms. Fiorilla was part of the team who successfully litigated Barr v. Drizly, LLC, Case No. 20-CV-11492 (D. Mass.), resulting in a multi-million-dollar settlement on behalf of millions of consumers impacted by the mishandling of their data.

Ms. Fiorilla is a zealous advocate and her ability to successfully navigate novel issues of law and fact are particularly useful in litigation involving new and emerging technologies. Ms. Fiorilla was selected as a Rising Star in the 2022 edition of Super Lawyers.

Facebook Twitter Dribbble Behance

Anthony Christina

Associate

Anthony Christina is a key member of Lowey Dannenberg’s privacy team and has helped achieve substantial recoveries on behalf of wronged consumers. Mr. Christina litigates Wesch v. Yodlee, No. 3:20-cv-05991 (N.D. Cal) and In re USAA Data Security Litigation, No. 21-cv-05813 (S.D.N.Y.), both involving unique claims under the California Anti-Phishing Act and the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act, respectively.
Mr. Christina was selected as a Rising Star in the 2021, 2022, and 2023 editions of Super Lawyers.

Facebook Twitter Dribbble Behance

Rachel Kesten

Associate

Rachel Kesten is a member of Lowey Dannenberg’s privacy practice and play an integral role in several class actions against some of the largest technology corporations in the world, including Google LLC, Meta Platforms, Inc., and TikTok, Inc. She actively litigates Frasco v. Flo Health, Inc., No. 3:21-cv-00757-JD (N.D. Cal.) and Wesch v. Yodlee, No. 3:20-cv-05991 (N.D. Cal), playing and an instrumental role in the team’s successful defeat of defendants’ motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment, respectively.

Facebook Twitter Dribbble Behance

Our Experts: Ready To Help

Christian Levis

Partner

Christian Levis heads Lowey Dannenberg’s privacy practice group and has served as co-lead counsel in several prominent actions resulting in more than $300 million recovered on behalf of individuals. An avid computer programmer with experience developing both iOS and Android apps, Mr. Levis has extensive experience litigating privacy class actions against some of the largest technology companies in the world.

Mr. Levis currently leads the prosecution in In re Google Assistant Priv. Litig., No. 5:19-cv-04286 (N.D. Cal.), a class action on behalf of Google Assistant Enabled Device users whose conversations were obtained by Google, LLC and shared with third parties without users’ consent, and Wesch v. Yodlee, No. 3:20-cv-05991 (N.D. Cal), another data privacy action alleging defendant collected and disclosed the sensitive financial information of tens of millions of individuals without their consent. Mr. Levis also serves as court appointed co-lead counsel in Frasco v. Flo Health, Inc., No. 3:21-cv-00757-JD (N.D. Cal.), alleging that Meta Platforms, Inc., Google LLC, Flurry, Inc., and Flo Health, Inc. intruded on the privacy rights of women by collecting app users’ medical information (including menstrual and fertility data) without consent. Other prominent actions include USAA Data Security Litigation, No. 21-cv-05813 (S.D.N.Y.) and Barr v. Drizly, LLC, Case No. 20-CV-11492 (D. Mass.).

Mr. Levis is a member of the New York State Bar Association’s Committee on Technology and the Legal Profession and is an expert in the use of analytics and technology-assisted document review in large class actions. Mr. Levis was selected as a Rising Star in the 2021 and 2022 editions of Super Lawyers.

Facebook Twitter Dribbble Behance

Amanda Fiorilla

Associate

Amanda Fiorilla is one of the founding members of the firm’s privacy and data breach practices and is well-versed in the unique issues arising in these types of cases. Ms. Fiorilla plays an integral role in several privacy class actions litigating against many large technology companies, including in Frasco v. Flo Health, Inc., No. 3:21-cv-00757-JD (N.D. Cal.) and Wesch v. Yodlee, No. 3:20-cv-05991 (N.D. Cal).

She, along with other members of the firm’s privacy group, serve as co-lead counsel in In re USAA Data Security Litigation, No. 21-cv-05813 (S.D.N.Y.). Their efforts resulted in one of the first decisions of its kind to sustain Drivers Privacy Protection Act claims arising out of an insurance company’s auto-populate feature that disclosed consumers’ private motor vehicle records to hackers and other unwanted third parties. Ms. Fiorilla was part of the team who successfully litigated Barr v. Drizly, LLC, Case No. 20-CV-11492 (D. Mass.), resulting in a multi-million-dollar settlement on behalf of millions of consumers impacted by the mishandling of their data.

Ms. Fiorilla is a zealous advocate and her ability to successfully navigate novel issues of law and fact are particularly useful in litigation involving new and emerging technologies. Ms. Fiorilla was selected as a Rising Star in the 2022 edition of Super Lawyers.

Facebook Twitter Dribbble Behance

Anthony Christina

Associate

Anthony Christina is a key member of Lowey Dannenberg’s privacy team and has helped achieve substantial recoveries on behalf of wronged consumers. Mr. Christina litigates Wesch v. Yodlee, No. 3:20-cv-05991 (N.D. Cal) and In re USAA Data Security Litigation, No. 21-cv-05813 (S.D.N.Y.), both involving unique claims under the California Anti-Phishing Act and the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act, respectively.
Mr. Christina was selected as a Rising Star in the 2021, 2022, and 2023 editions of Super Lawyers.

Facebook Twitter Dribbble Behance

Rachel Kesten

Associate

Rachel Kesten is a member of Lowey Dannenberg’s privacy practice and play an integral role in several class actions against some of the largest technology corporations in the world, including Google LLC, Meta Platforms, Inc., and TikTok, Inc. She actively litigates Frasco v. Flo Health, Inc., No. 3:21-cv-00757-JD (N.D. Cal.) and Wesch v. Yodlee, No. 3:20-cv-05991 (N.D. Cal), playing and an instrumental role in the team’s successful defeat of defendants’ motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment, respectively.

Facebook Twitter Dribbble Behance

Suffered due to privacy infringement or other misconduct?
LOWEY may be able to help.

Our attorneys can assist you with evaluating your investments and determine whether your losses give rise to claims under state or federal securities laws. This evaluation is free and of no cost to you. We only receive a legal fee if we file a case on your behalf and are able to recover compensation for you.

Free Case Evaluation