More than 50 years of landmark results
Since 1967, Lowey Dannenberg has represented investors and major corporations in complex litigation, recovering billions of dollars on their behalf.Solutions for Complex Cases
Professional Recommendations
Recent Cases
Roche v. Aetna, Inc.
Healthcare, Notable
Lowey Dannenberg is defending Aetna in a class action related to state anti-subrogation laws. Minerley v. Aetna Inc., et al., 13-cv-1337 (D.N.J.). Lowey Dannenberg has defended and won dismissal of […]
Federated Investment Management Company, et al., v. Republic of Argentina
Antitrust
Lowey obtained emergency injunctive relief on behalf of Federated Investors, one of the largest investment firms in the country with over $363 billion in assets under management, preventing the Government […]
Juniper Networks
Notable
Lowey Dannenberg served as lead counsel, representing the New York City Pension Funds and related class members, alleging that Juniper Networks, Inc. fraudulently concealed the backdating of millions of stock […]
News
Lowey Defeats Motion to Dismiss against Domino Sugar and United Sugar in Sugar Antitrust Case
On October 15th, 2025, Judge Blackwell denied the motion to dismiss as against the two largest sugar producers in the country, Domino Sugar and United Sugar, on nearly 100 state antitrust, consumer protection, and equitable claims. In re Granulated Sugar Antitrust...
Blog
The Delaware Court of Chancery Finds Justified Fee-Shifting Against a Corporation Based on Egregious Conduct in Books and Records Action
The general rule in the United States justice system, the so-called “American Rule,” is that each party to litigation must pay its own attorney’s fees. The underlying rationale for the rule is that a plaintiff should not be deterred from bringing a meritorious case to court for fear of prohibitive...