More than 50 years of landmark results
Since 1967, Lowey Dannenberg has represented investors and major corporations in complex litigation, recovering billions of dollars on their behalf.Solutions for Complex Cases
Professional Recommendations
Recent Cases
Doe v. Google LLC, 5:23-CV-02431 (N.D. Cal.)
Data Breach and Privacy, Data Privacy
Lowey serves as Co-Lead Class Counsel representing Plaintiffs and Class Members alleging that Google collected individuals’ health data through sophisticated tracking technology, including Google Analytics, incorporated on the websites of […]
Doe v. Favor, Inc., 3:23-00059 (N.D. Cal.).
Data Breach and Privacy, Data Privacy
Lowey Dannenberg represents a class of Favor (formerly Pill Club) website and app users alleging their personal data, including prescription information relating to birth control and Plan B, were unlawfully […]
Doe. v. Good Rx Holdings, Inc., No. 3:23-cv-00501-AMO (N.D. Cal.)
Data Privacy
Lowey serves as interim co-lead class counsel on behalf of Plaintiffs and Class members alleging that advertisers Google, Meta, and Criteo unlawfully intercepted GoodRx users’ medical information, including prescription information, as a result of GoodRx’s incorporation of its co-defendants’ tracking […]
News
Lowey Defeats Motion to Dismiss against Domino Sugar and United Sugar in Sugar Antitrust Case
On October 15th, 2025, Judge Blackwell denied the motion to dismiss as against the two largest sugar producers in the country, Domino Sugar and United Sugar, on nearly 100 state antitrust, consumer protection, and equitable claims. In re Granulated Sugar Antitrust...
Blog
Hiding the Ball: The Implications of the Marketing Rule
On August 23, 1940, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed two bills into law, the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the Investment Advisors Act of 1940 (the “Investment Act”), both of which were aimed to protect investors from a lack of disclosures. The main goal of the Investment Act was to...

