More than 50 years of landmark results
Since 1967, Lowey Dannenberg has represented investors and major corporations in complex litigation, recovering billions of dollars on their behalf.Solutions for Complex Cases
Professional Recommendations
Recent Cases
Lopez v. Apple, Inc., No. 19-cv-04577 (N.D. Cal.)
Data Breach and Privacy, Data Privacy
Lowey Dannenberg serves as co-lead class counsel in a class action on behalf of consumers alleging that Apple unlawfully and intentionally recorded Plaintiffs’ and class members’ confidential communications without their […]
Shelled Eggs
Antitrust, Commodities
On June 8, Lowey Dannenberg Chairman Vincent Briganti was appointed as Co-Lead Counsel for the Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs in In Re: Shell Eggs Antitrust Litigation, No. 3:26-md-03175-JDP (W.D. Wisc.) Plaintiffs […]
Amitza
Healthcare
Lowey Dannenberg, on behalf of named plaintiff Premera Blue Cross, is leading a class on behalf of Third-Party Payers of Amitiza (Lubiprostone) against Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. and related entities. […]
News
Lowey Defeats Motion to Dismiss against Domino Sugar and United Sugar in Sugar Antitrust Case
On October 15th, 2025, Judge Blackwell denied the motion to dismiss as against the two largest sugar producers in the country, Domino Sugar and United Sugar, on nearly 100 state antitrust, consumer protection, and equitable claims. In re Granulated Sugar Antitrust...
Blog
Hiding the Ball: The Implications of the Marketing Rule
On August 23, 1940, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed two bills into law, the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the Investment Advisors Act of 1940 (the “Investment Act”), both of which were aimed to protect investors from a lack of disclosures. The main goal of the Investment Act was to...

